Feb
10
Slumdog’s bait and switch
February 10, 2009 posted by indiatime |
Shahrukh Khan, Bollywood’s famous superstar, is slamming those who are criticizing this year’s Oscar shoo-win Slumdog Millionaire. For some reasons, it has suddenly become trendy and fashionable and politically correct to support this movie. Most of those who support the movie and criticize the critiques probably haven’t watched the movie. And so haven’t most who seem to be supporting it. So sometimes I wonder where all the Slumdog hype is coming from.
It seems to me that most who haven’t watched the movie are judging it by watching the judging of the movie by those who haven’t watched it either. Shahrukh Khan has contended that Slumdog’s has a visually appealing way about about it. Well, I agree. As one of those few who have actually watched the movie and sat through (I know several who have left the movie in the middle unable to take the abusive, cursory and cursive dialogs), I won’t deny that there is something appealing about Slumdog Millionaire. As someone who has lived in Mumbai for many years, I can also tell you that that something appealing doesn’t stem from Danny Boyle’s lens but comes from Mumbai’s own backdrop, a sensual patchwork of colors, flavors, heat, humidity, spices, sweat, disagreeable and agreeable fragrances, hot salty winds, all of it. And as someone who has worked in those slums trying to keep the young slumdogs in elementary schools, I can assure you that the visual appeal isn’t all that visual and sensual from ground zero.
But let’s keep the visual appeal aside for a moment. More than the broadbrushing of Mumbai’s reality, I think it’s the broadsiding of the reality that I find unappealing and distasteful. Once again, I have no problems if a filmmaker chooses to pull a tight close of a pile of you know what. And I will take no issue if some others find it visually appealing. But it’s the premise of the story, the silly plot, the stupid Cinderella tale, the all-too-easy money scam that mocks Mumbai’s reality, an incredibly unrealistic fairytale of a British-accented slum-dweller who rises from the pile of you know what to become a millionaire by virtue of a million life experiences that become the 10 questions in the quizmaster’s arsenal.
What I dislike about Slumdog isn’t the way it has depicted Mumbai. I really don’t care about that. But I hate the bait and switch that twists reality into the fairytale. Having taught a little bit of ABCs to those same slumdogs, I think I have a right to dislike the mocking of those of them who do not speak with a British accent. And I also dislike the way the disagreeable odors of reality suddenly become fashionably agreeable when a storyteller wishes those odors and those ills and those curses away - simply by waving a quizmaster’s wand and turning destitutes into zillionaires - hardly the message intended by those who, even today, work in those same slums, day in and day out, day and night, for months and years, tutoring and mentoring individuals, sweating it out to keep those poor souls into schools, pleading and begging the parents and the governments and the society to pay attention.
Still, there’s no denying that art imitates life. And how a pile of you know what can suddenly turn into wads of fame. And cash. And awards.
Comments
19 Comments so far
Search
Most commented
Mumbai's communal overtones signal upcoming elections (475)Why did Kolkata police murder Rizwanur Rahman? (329)
Ten reasons why India is doing better than Pakistan 60 years after independence (317)
Bun roller millionnaire saves Indicted Swami's buns by posting $10 bond (94)
Top 10 reasons India sucks at the Olympics (64)
Auntie, Corruption bureau and Crime branch (48)
Shah Rukh Khan detained at immigration checkpoint in US (44)
Ishmeet Singh (1989-2008) (39)
And my vote for a modern day wonder goes to.....India! (37)
Convicted Czech scientist flees India (36)
Most visited
Hollywood’s first Indian starMeeting Raj Kapoor at the barbershop
Madhubala on a postal stamp
Why I’m happier than Mukesh Ambani
An inconvenient truth about India’s intellectual property
UFOs may be ‘idlis’ but time travels only in ‘medu-wadas’
Dr Singh is no Dr King
Lesser Known Indians
The Most ‘Nobel’ Teacher of Them All
The third Indian revered in China
A little Poland in India
The vanishing of Indian languages
The looting of Chandigarh’s treasures
Bharat, Pakistan and Hindustan, Indiana
Welcome to India, Steve!
Top 5 explanations for the president’s gesture
An IIT on every street, an IIM on every block
Pakistan, Jinnah, Wadias and the American anthem
An IAS officer’s nightmare of lustful, lascivious stares comes true

Yes bait and switch precisely; I took the bait of the trailer and found the real thing to be different. Here was my review from Dec 31, possibly the first from India.
http://independentindian.com/2008/12/31/how-sad-that-slumdog-millionaire-is-so-disappointing/
The most touching comment about the film was made by a teenage girl from one of those Mumbai slums:
” I want the name (of the film) changed, because we are not dogs!”
As far as Shahrukh Khan is concerned,I think he is The Monkey of our silver screen- not more than that,not less than that!
very very correct. i was one of those who found the spoken dialogues disgusting. However there were those sitting next to me who were reading the subtitles and getting a cleaner version of the dialogues. i stayed throughout and came out thinking that it was a disappointing experience (agree with dr subroto roy). sorry to have wasted my hard-earned money.
Little girl’s sentiments are really a slap on face of these millionaire dogs. Thanks Dr.Subroto for clearing the clouds of ignorance.
The movie portrays dirt and filth so much so that a foreigner said right in front of me that this not the country worth visiting .Secondly we read in the newspaper that the family of young boy and girl from the movie are homeless in real life and they have been paid very little.There is no mention of young actors during the hoopla of oscar.PITY.
There goes Vinoy ranting again…!
The movie was good though!
Oh yes it did!
who is this scum of the earth? doesn’t this b…..d has anything worthwhile to say?
Yes.. Agree with VINOY.. Shahrukh is a MONKEY..a very OLD & UGLY one.
Also, If Danny BOY & Shahrukh could donate all their earnings to Children’s charity work in Mumbai, then YES, I will also cheer for them.
An insolent bugger,this Parmar!
How much I love you guys! Plus, the capital R in your nick is really making you sound serious now.
And your D for DUNDERHEAD!!!!!
Hahahahahahaha!!! I’m really scared now
Now, come on, if you have something intelligent to say about me then say it
Until then, by what I’ve seen from your posts, I would rather have one of my dogs sit down here and answer your intellectual posts.
A dog yourself,having a dog as pet!I leave you together alone to suck each other’s salive.Bye.
Finally, after 3 unnecessary posts, you understand that you’re actually not making a point and leave? Talk about Downs Syndrome!
Good on you Shahrukh. At least you are more real than the people who love to live in their fantazy world. Slumdog millionaire wasn’t about the slums im India(which is real anyway). Just a story of a boy from the slums who became a millionaire.
this movie did not deserve an oscar, it is just the exploitation of our culture by foreigners, i wanted lagaan to win the oscars, but too bad it did not!:(