Sep

11

High court judge rules Gita should be followed by all citizens

September 11, 2007 posted by indiatime |

4 Comments so far

1. Apt on September 11, 2007 8:52 pm

   Sir,
   A judge, who takes oath of faith & allegiance in the dreaded predator & pirate Indian Constitution has no moral right to speak on Gita.
   Eradication of human race is imminent. Human race has lost wisdom. A Government that extorts taxes over 17% of the produce is extortionist. A religion that snatches freedom of worship cannot be secular. The words, “Public Interest” & “Social Justice” are weapons to usurp the belongings of the haves. The end payers of corporate tax, VAT and even Income tax are poor people. The industrialists and traders are being blackmailed to loot the poor and pass the booty to the dreaded democratic Governments. If one says that the tax is used for the welfare of poor, one is patently wrong. Bofor Chor Rajiv Gandhi, the so-called Mr. clean, had already told the nation in 1985 that 85% money of exchequer was being siphoned off by the intermediaries during his tenure. Now the position has further deteriorated. Look! Poor Jehovah has no share in booty. Poor Allah takes 20% only. (Koran 8:41). However, Pratibha and thief Antonia Maino and their servants gallop 85% of the exchequer as per the admission of the ex PM of this dreaded Democracy!
   Right of private defence provided vide Sections 102 & 105 of the Indian Penal Code is being denied by the Presidents & the State Governors, who are armed with Sections 196 & 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Judiciary has held Koran & Bible religious books. No court can sit in to judgment against these books. (Chandmal Chopra v State of West Bengal AIR 1986 CALCUTTA 104; 1986 Cr.L.J. 182). Armed with the section 196 of Criminal Procedure Code that restrains citizens, police and judges from taking any action against Azan & Namaz u/s 153 & 295 of the Indian Penal Code, President & Governors are deliberately protecting assassins, robbers and rapists to eradicate Human race as such are culprits punishable u/s 108 of the Indian Penal Code. Police THAT cannot arrest Muslim Imam, who shouts Azaan and thus insults Ishwar and Vedic culture, are deputed to protect Muslims, who abuse non-Muslim faiths & incite communal violence. No judge can take cognizance against Azaan, Koran & Bible under the very section 196. No Police can be prosecuted under the section 197.
   While Muslims & Christians are armed with draconian Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution to eradicate Vedic culture, President Pratibha, Governors, & District Magistrates have been armed with sections 196 & 197 to protect Muslims & Christians with incentive to usurp the belongings of the haves under Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution.
   The fundamental Right to Property provided vide Article 31 of the Indian Constitution could not be snatched even by the Britons and the Constitution Committee. This Article 31 was amended by the dacoit Parliamentarians and upheld by the apex Court. Now the Article has been omitted from the Constitution since 20.06.1979.
   Apt

2. B.N.Gururaj on December 18, 2007 2:52 pm

   Dear Sir,

   Gita is not a battle field philosophy. Life is the symbolic battlefield - Arjuna is one of the myraid lives who seek solace. The fact that Gita has stood the test of time for over two millennium should speak something about its universality and timelessness. What are you afraid of? Your testing two millennium old Gita against democratic concepts which are but barely couple of hundred years old, that too, mostly tested only in the twentieth century. You, who claim to know Gita by heart, must point out what is undemocratic about Gita. Not speak in generalities and try to expell the judge from the court.

   Do you think this happens in USA, if a US court judge admires Bible?

   Your plaititudes to democracy and denigrating Gita is rank hypocracy.

   Yours faithfully,
   B.N.Gururaj,
   Bangalore.

3. indiatime on December 19, 2007 12:35 am

   Gururaj,

   A judge who sits on any court in India, must adhere and rule by the constitution. Whether we like it or not, that is how it works.

   I know several judges in Mumbai who rule strictly by the constitution from their bench, while practise and preach Gita in their private life. In fact, some of these judges, when invited as public speakers, often speak about Gita as a guiding principle. I don’t have a problem with that, as I myself feel that Gita is the finest discourse on life-philosophy known to mankind.

   Here is where the problem is. India, in 1950, decided that it will have a legal document called the constitution, and all the laws of this land will have to adhere to whatver is in that constitution. If you want to change or make amendments ot that constitution, there is a legal process through our parliamentary system through our local representatives. If enough people agree that Gita needs to be followed by all the Indians, then that may very well happen. For now, however, that is not the case. So any judge who speaks outside of the constitutional principles is really not being honest to his or her oath of office.

   As for your reference to a US judge admiring the bible. Sure there have been cases where judges in the US have admired the bible from their bench. In fact, some judges have gone further and ruled to have stone inscriptions with ten commandments inside court premises.

   But ther has NEVER been a case where a US judge has ruled that every US citizen has to follow either the bible or Christianity.

4. Antony on May 30, 2009 9:28 am

   To Mr. J. M. James High court judge……………………………………Dear Sir I am writing to inform you your brother Antony Mosses / Mosses Miranda son is now in U.S.A. please call me my email is antonymosses@yahoo.com please send one message after I will send you my personal phone number.